Global trends and institutional experience with laparoscopic and open appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis (2018 – september 2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67572/eshs1966Keywords:
acute appendicitis, complicated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy, open appendectomy, minimally invasive surgeryAbstract
Introduction: Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical emergencies, while its complicated forms continue to pose a significant clinical challenge. Over the past decades, minimally invasive techniques have profoundly changed the management paradigm of the disease, although in cases of complicated appendicitis (perforation, gangrene, abscess, or peritonitis) the choice of surgical approach remains a matter of debate.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 102 (82.3%) had complicated disease, treated at the Clinic of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Alexandrovska University Hospital, during the period 2018–September 2025. Clinical presentation, type of surgical intervention (open appendectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, right hemicolectomy), postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.
Results: Open appendectomy was performed in 83.1% of patients, laparoscopic appendectomy in 12.1%, and right hemicolectomy in 4.8%. By 2025, laparoscopic procedures accounted for 54% of all appendectomies. The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (5.2 vs. 7.8 days; p<0.05), with no difference in complication rates between the two approaches.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is increasingly established as the method of choice not only for uncomplicated but also for selected cases of complicated acute appendicitis. The data from our institution confirm its safety, improved postoperative recovery, and shorter hospital stay with comparable morbidity rates.
References
1. Søreide K, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5
2. Petroianu A. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2012;10(3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.006
3. Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3
4. Mosch T, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):451–60.
5. Yang J, Chen Y, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3353–65.
6. Southgate E, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: updated meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2021;108(9):1109–1123.
7. Park HC, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. World J Surg. 2022;46(2):384–392.
8. Ceresoli M, et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic surgery in complicated appendicitis. Updates Surg. 2022;74(3):867–879.
9. Cheng Y, et al. Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for perforated appendicitis. Updates Surg. 2023;75(3):893–906.
10. Rauf F, Hussain N, et al. Typical and atypical presentations of appendicitis. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37024.
11. Sallinen V, et al. Surgical management of appendicitis in the era of laparoscopy. Ann Surg. 2023;278(1):e25–e34.
12. Alvarado A, et al. Diagnostic challenges in atypical appendicitis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14):3149.
13. SAGES Clinical Spotlight Review. Guidelines for laparoscopic management of acute appendicitis. SAGES, 2024.
14. EAES Consensus Statement on Complicated Appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(5):3894–3905.
